Checklist for papers to be submitted
Information and Software Technology


General
1. Is the paper within the scope of the journal?
2. Is the English of satisfactory quality for a journal publication?
3. Is the paper suitable (i.e. the work is novel and the results of sufficient importance) for an archival, research-oriented journal?
4. Does the paper properly establish its relationship to existing research? This should include similar works previously published by the authors or their colleagues. Where there is overlap this should be explicitly described in the paper. Failure to reference similar works (sometimes referred to as self-plagiarism) is grounds for rejection of a paper.
Introduction
5. Is the title clear and specific? Does it describe the content of the paper?
6. Does the paper include keywords? Will the keywords assist people in locating your work?
7. Is there an abstract? Does it provide an effective summary of the paper? Could you understand the overall contribution of the paper solely through the abstract?
8. Is there an introduction that clearly states the research question(s), motivation and contribution of the paper?
Main body
9. Does the paper have a clear structure that is easy to follow?
10. Is related work described in suitable depth?
11. Is the research method sound and is it described in sufficient detail? Could other researchers replicate the work?
12. Are the results clearly presented?
13. Does the paper contain a suitable mixture of text, figures and tables?
Conclusions
14. Are the conclusions clear and adequate? Are the conclusions based on either references or results from the paper?
References
15. Does the reference list contain references to recent research; usually this will include works published within the last five years?
16. Is there a suitable mixture of references to work of others and own work? References to the author's own work should not constitute an excessive portion of the total number of references. Avoid excessive references to hard to obtain works, foreign language works or as yet unpublished works.
17. Are the references complete and accurate?